Part of his argument for continuing to use embryonic stem cells was backward-looking to make the point that researchers wouldn’t have been able to develop this technique if they hadn’t been doing embryonic stem cell research.
I think that’s true, although in a certain way it actually vindicates the logic of President Bush’s stem cell policy, which is to allow some work to be done – without creating an incentive for the destruction of further embryos – to advance the basic science in these kinds of directions.
Thomson also argued that there will still be a need to use embryos in the future.
I think that’s also a fair argument in the sense that there are always interesting things to learn from different kinds of experiments, but it doesn’t address the ethical issues surrounding the debate.
A counterargument explaining the case embryonic stem cell research is made by Jonathan Moreno, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress in Washington, D. Featuring: Yuval Levin, Hertog Fellow and Director of the Bioethics and American Democracy Program, Ethics and Public Policy Center Interviewer: David Masci, Senior Research Fellow, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life Recently, researchers in the United States and Japan successfully turned human skin cells into cells that behave like embryonic stem cells.
Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay Descriptive Essay Topics For College Students
There has been some discussion that this advance makes the moral and ethical debate over embryonic stem cells moot. I think it’s going to take a while for the ethical debate to catch up with the science.
The pursuit and production of knowledge through scientific research is an undertaking that offers enormous intellectual rewards for researchers while also performing an important social function.
The advancement of science has transformed our lives in ways that would have been unpredictable just a half-century ago.
The work of scientists is, and should be, conditioned and directed by consideration of broader human values.
This means that the development of public policy, especially where highly controversial matters are involved, must take all interested sectors of the public into account.