Tags: Psychosynthesis London BridgeDissertation Topic On MarketingEssay On Horror GenreLaw Essay WritingWriting A Dissertation ConclusionCorporate Social Responsibility Research PapersCharles Beard Economic Interpretation Constitution ThesisMultiple Intelligence Research PaperSuccessful College Essays Ivy League
On many levels, our Track II was a dialogue of dissonance.Take the political and security situation in Afghanistan, perhaps the most compelling reason for the United States and Pakistan to cooperate. objectives in Afghanistan (does the United States wish to stay in the country to push back against Chinese influence or to combat terror?In contrast, the Obama administration launched and oversaw a U.
Our main takeaway from a year of discussions is sobering: While there are still very real convergences in U.
S.-Pakistan relations, the divergences are deep and daunting.
When it comes to pathways for future cooperation, however, our discussions suggested the pickings are slim.
One problem is that participants proposed and embraced a number of ideas that may prove too ambitious for a U. administration likely to focus narrowly on hard security issues in U. This is, after all, an administration that has sought to marginalize — by cutting budgets and refusing to fill senior positions — the State Department, typically the agency that manages the non-security aspects of U.
S.-Pakistan ties (along with USAID, which also faces budget cuts and has already suffered job cuts).
Additionally, a senior White House South Asia official, briefing our participants in August, bluntly stated that Trump’s Pakistan policy will revolve around protecting American lives — suggesting that terrorism and security concerns will take center stage in the relationship.
The main participants were former senior American and Pakistani government and military officials, and other experts on U.
S.-Pakistan relations were in the room serving as discussants and making occasional interventions.
The Right Time for a Track II The timing for our dialogue was propitious. “The authors of the strategy did a great disservice to U.
S.-Pakistan relations,” lamented one of our Pakistani participants. Secretary of Defense James Mattis could involve some uncomfortable discussions.